RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:35:44 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
Charles Childress <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
 "the VP has raised an interesting constitutional question"
> 


So what's different now from the time that Cheney thought a Congressional
probe in to the workings of his energy task force "would unconstitutionally
interfere with the functioning of the executive branch" (which the SCOTUS
agreed with). 

Neither fish nor foul...go away National Archives Security inspectors.

Does anyone really get to have it both ways?
 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2