Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:45 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Angie,
In my organization, I keep the Policy separate from the Schedule for that
reason. It allows me to revise the schedule or the Policy separatly.
note that before it was kept as one piece of document.
Michele Bernard, MLIS
Director of Records Management
1130 Sherbrooke W. 4th Floor
Phone : 514-841-3250 ex 1004767
Montreal Qc
H3A 2M8
www.cgi.com
2011/3/28 Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>
> I am writing an organization's first retention schedule.
>
> I have usually made retention schedules an attachment to the Records
> Management Policy, because it was part of the overall corporate records
> management policy and was a specific schedule of how to manage the
> lifecycle of records whether I became the custodian of those records or
> not. I was always able to update my schedule separately from my
> records management policy.
>
> My current organization considers a policy and all of its attachments
> one single document that requires a higher level of review in its
> entirety, but the level of review that would take place may take a long
> time. So, does anyone do it differently?
>
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|