Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:17:00 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Gordy Hoke said "If a record for a 30-year lease was stored on a CD, the renewal field's date would be within the life expectancy of the CD"
With all due respect, Gordy, I think it would be EXTREMELY FOOLISH to expect a 30-year life expectancy for any CD.
Reasons:
- Manufacturing characteristics of the "CD" (CD-ROM vs. CD-/+R vs. CD-/+RW).
- Encoding of CD (CD-ROM vs. CD-R vs. CD+R vs. CD-RW vs. CD+RW).
- Environmental conditions under which the "CD" (whatever type and encoding) has been stored.
- Availability of appropriate "CD drive", both hardware and software. My staff recently retrieved from off-site (non climate-controlled) storage a box containing 8" floppy disks. Best guess is Vydec or Wang ...
- Availability of appropriate operating system and platform. "Signals" (a US Library of Congress publication on digital preservation) recently featured an article on the practical impossibility of retrieving info from a "CD" from the early 1990s.
That said, I completely agree with the notion of including a "life of media" field (and tickler) in any inventory and retention schedule (and, consequently, in any records management system). Thanks for suggesting it, Gordy.
Fred
---------------------------------
Frederic J. Grevin
[log in to unmask]
212-312-3903
Vice-President, Records Management
New York City Economic Development Corporation
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|