Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:06:37 -0800 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Glen Sanderson
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Deb, will you please explain 0M destroy immediately and when that would be
> used? Also it does seem a bit excessive on the number of retention periods
> you have however it does beat Indefinite.
>
>
Deb was actually being gracious listing ONLY the ones she listed... DOE
also has a myriad of "Event plus" retention periods. The most difficult
thing about applying many of these is it's subjective as to when the
"Event" occurs.
I can't speak for Deb's DOE "0M" but in our case, it's either worded as
"Destroy immediately" which essentially means it's a non-record, because
you DON'T retain it at all or "Destroy when obsolete or superseded" which
means it's a transitory record and no longer has any 'record' value when it
is revised.
Larry
[log in to unmask]
--
*Lawrence J. Medina Danville, CARIM Professional since 1972*
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|