RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Autoclassification, but Simpler
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:53:45 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines) 
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Gary Link <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> My system as envisioned would not rely on a preset role and folder
> structure at all. The folders would be created when the task is created.
> It would receive the record series code assigned to the function it was
> created under.


Interesting concept, but "tasks" or "projects" often contain a variety of
records associated with a wide range of record series, so how would it
differentiate between these?

Correspondence, environmental, procurement, logistics, facilities, etc all
have different requirements and record series (and sub-series), with
differing retentions. And how would you apply legal holds or destruction
moratoriums when needed?

I think it might be a simple "solution" that results in even greater
challenges down the road.



-- 
Larry
[log in to unmask]



*----Lawrence J. MedinaDanville, CARIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2