Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:18:55 -0800 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Glen Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> While in the selection process for jury duty the following question was
> asked by the defense.
> Is it:
> (1) worse to send an innocent person to jail
> (2) let a guilty person go home.
>
Is this a case of "degrees of wrong"?
I'd say knowingly doing #1 OR #2 constitutes a definite miscarriage of
justice... and this happens in many cases when there is a possibly "hung"
jury, and a foreperson attempts to bully or intimidate the pool of jurors
into changing their votes.
Thee are some cases when there is a "three strikes" issue at stake,
depending upon the severity of the incident, jurors may be less likely to
issue a guilty verdict and send someone to prison indefinitely. But many
of these things are plead down before it comes to trial.
I'm not sure the judge should have actually allowed a question of this type
to be asked during jury selection.... to me, it sounds as if it would
potentially poison the pool.
--
Larry
[log in to unmask]
*----Lawrence J. MedinaDanville, CARIM Professional since 1972*
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|