RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:18:55 -0800
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Glen Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> While in the selection process for jury duty the following question was
> asked by the defense.
> Is it:
> (1) worse to send an innocent person to jail
> (2) let a guilty person go home.
>


Is this a case of "degrees of wrong"?

I'd say knowingly doing #1 OR #2 constitutes a definite miscarriage of
justice... and this happens in many cases when there is a possibly "hung"
jury, and a foreperson attempts to bully or intimidate the pool of jurors
into changing their votes.

Thee are some cases when there is a "three strikes" issue at stake,
depending upon the severity of the incident, jurors may be less likely to
issue a guilty verdict and send someone to prison indefinitely.  But many
of these things are plead down before it comes to trial.

I'm not sure the judge should have actually allowed a question of this type
to be asked during jury selection.... to me, it sounds as if it would
potentially poison the pool.

-- 
Larry
[log in to unmask]



*----Lawrence J. MedinaDanville, CARIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2