RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Blake Richardson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:36:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Good Tuesday evening colleagues.  Recently I posted my opinion about
Information Governance ("IG").  I think I used a lipstick and a pig analogy
- I meant no offense to folks who are trying to further IG.  I want to
state that I am not anti-IG, actually my title is IG manager and I
activated my Company's IG Council.

My minimalist rant was more about how some vendors and associations have
muddied the waters for RIM professionals - many RIM professionals are
confused.  I am a believer in organizations defining their
strategic/tactical approaches as to how they want information to benefit
the company - what do you want from your informational assets.

Believe it or not...even large companies are still dealing with defining
what is a record, whose the office of record, what should be listed on the
record retention schedule.

I understand that IG is a comprehensive approach to the management of
information, and appreciate the efforts of people who promote it.

Blake E. Richardson, CRM
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2