RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Date:
Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:59:16 +0000
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Frederic Grevin <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Brett, by "Review/Authorization Process for Records that are eligible for retention" do you mean a process that takes place IMMEDIATELY BEFORE the disposition of a specific set of records at a specific time?

If so, my current practice is we do NOT seek such authorization; it was provided at the stage when the records retention and disposition schedules were developed.

In the past, I did have to deal with such a process, and it was AGONISINGLY slow (as in, years), as no fewer than 17 distinct unit heads in the legal department had to review and approve it. This process was, for them, at the absolute bottom of their list of priorities, thus accounting for the delays.

I'm leaving aside holds for litigation, regulatory requirements, and audits, which are exception-based situations.

Best regards,

Fred
                        
Frederic J. Grevin
[log in to unmask]
212-312-3903 (w)

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2