RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date:
Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:51:58 +0000
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Donna Day asked for feedback on those Office 365 vendors who recommend that emails be retained permanently as a method of addressing eDiscovery risks.

In my (admittedly jaundiced) opinion, Office 365 vendors do not yet have a satisfactory/practical  approach to applying retention to emails.  Rather than acknowledging this, or making the effort to understand the related issues, they instead take a marketing approach and try to turn a liability into an asset.  So, they hide the inadequacies of the product under the mantle of “eDiscovery risk”.

Old emails are much more likely to hurt an organization than to help.  Most attorneys who’ve defended against costly litigation advocate for disposing of emails as quickly as possible.  

One woman’s opinion.

Pilar McAdam, CRM
[log in to unmask]
Los Angeles, CA

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2