RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:04:26 +0300
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From:
NKhramtsovsky <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Dear colleagues,

In my Terry Pratchett-ish practical opinion, record is any entity that (potentially) functions as such, and should be handled with a discipline reserved for the records :) As the US legislation sees it, back-ups definitely are ESI. In e-discovery ESI is essentially on par with records. If there is no practical difference, why differentiate?

Granted, backups are not “official” assets. However, they are not always merely “copies”. If a record e.g. was digitally signed, its instance on backup tape is original.

@Luciana: Proper back-ups must be created in the “usual and ordinary course of business” :)

With my best regards,
Natasha Khramtsovsky

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2