RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:11:16 -0500
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Use of Personal Email Debated in Public Records Case
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Marko Sillanpaa <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (55 lines) 
Great to see that we in Florida are ahead of California on this.  Public
employees are not allowed to use their personal email accounts to discuss
work matters.  If it's proven that they did, with a simple email from the
other side showing they did, then that account is open to disclosure.  This
has been upheld in court.  Oddly the same county that got the big fine got
hit twice.  This is now part of mandated training to all public officials.

-----------------------------------------------------
Marko Sillanpaa, CIP, ECMᵖ, SMGᵖ
www.BigMenOnContent.com
[log in to unmask]
925-997-6969

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:18 PM, PeterK <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> (CN) – California’s high court grappled Wednesday with just how much
> privacy a public employee can expect when using a personal phone or email
> account to discuss work matters, in the city of San Jose’s challenge of
> whether the California Public Records Act should apply to unofficial texts
> and emails that pertain to the people’s business.
>
> “The critical question is always whether the information relates to the
> conduct of the public’s  business. I think it is a fair rule to say that
> when you’re talking about public business, conducting pubic business, or
> doing something related to public business, that is probably going to be
> subject to disclosure,” said Karl Olson, a lawyer for the California
> Newspaper Publishers Association, an intervening party in a lawsuit.
>
>
> http://bit.ly/2hPQYDb
> http://bit.ly/2hPQYDb+
>
>
> --
> Peterk
> Dallas, Tx
> [log in to unmask]
> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
> “If only there were a massive entity that I were forced to fund to tell me
> how I should live my life, since I’m so obviously incapable of deciding for
> myself.” M. Hashimoto
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2