The article noted that the government employee in question was at the
senior level.  If that is the case their position could fall under
Capstone  This would mean his or her records would be retained for a
long period of time.  Granted, Capstone applies to email. But one
could easily make the argument that texts should be included as well.
And since, by definition, they are considered government records
shouldn't they be retained.

My question - why hasn't the EPA implemented a system to capture texts
messages from government issued cell phones and if they do are they
using it?  I know there are a number of commercial off the shelf
(COTS) products that do this.  The financial industry has been
capturing texts for years in compliance with SEC and FINRA
requirement.  Government agencies, IMHO, should be doing the same as
well.

Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Radnor, PA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco

On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Peter Kurilecz
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> and what verification is done to ensure that such content is captured in a
> memo to file? I still find it curious that only 80+ messages out of 3
> million were considered worthy of retention. I agree that there would be
> some transitory type text messages but not 3 million +
>
> wouldn't one think that the administrators text messages were worthy of
> retention?

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]