Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:35:07 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
According to Reps. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) and Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), there
is a “discouraging” lack of transparency and archiving on the part of the
federal government.
The congressman said at a Feb. 1 event that the recent presidential
transition proved there needs to be a more formal process for archiving the
federal government’s digital footprint, but neither went as far as to
propose what this process should look like.
“It was discouraging to learn that the federal government does not have a
formal process for archiving .gov sites during the change in
administrations,” Quigley said. Besides missing the chance to preserve
information related to the transfer of power, “this poses a particular
concern for vital scientific research and data that might be out of line
with different views,” he added.
http://bit.ly/2lj3nlk
http://bit.ly/2lj3nlk+
--
Peterk
Dallas, Tx
[log in to unmask]
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
“If only there were a massive entity that I were forced to fund to tell me
how I should live my life, since I’m so obviously incapable of deciding for
myself.” M. Hashimoto
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|