RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date:
Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:51 +0000
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Percentage of Permanent Records
From:
Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
Mark - The percentage of utility records that are permanent would depend primarily on how many deal with land and facility information (e.g., where transmission lines are located, layouts, blueprints, etc.), which would constitute the bulk of the permanent records.  Additionally, these land and facility records tend to be large format and/or CAD-type records, requiring more overall storage resources.  A sampling of box contents should provide a first-order estimate of the proportion that are land/facility related.

One woman’s opinion.

Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
Los Angeles, CA
[log in to unmask]    

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2