RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Revised Rule 37 (e)
From:
"Petersen, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:49:11 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
Happy Monday,

We're in the middle of gaining approvals for a NAS filer storage reduction project and are facing some resistance from the legal folks saying a judge would destroy us for deleting it without what we feel are onerous reviews.  We've put what we feel are reasonable due diligence efforts into the project from a number of angles including RIM, information security, IT and the businesses.

Has anyone else found ways and/or case law that support the new Rule 37 (e) requirements to overcome this type of resistance?

Thanks

Steve Petersen, CRM | Records Manager, Records & Information Management
o: 319-355-5837 |
e: :[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>| w: www.transamerica.com<http://www.transamerica.com>

Transamerica
[6400 C ST SW Cedar Rapids, IA 52404]
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/Transamerica> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/transamerica> | YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/user/TRANSAMERICA> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/transamerica>


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2