RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Cost Savings on Destroyed Records? (UNCLASSIFIED)
From:
"Bell, Laura Ms ASA(ALT)/IMO" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:32:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines) 
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Since these are costs often referred to as soft costs could they be shared
with the rest of the listserve?  Storage of electronic records seems to be
looked on as cheaper than paper but is usually still costly and saves time
in retrieving, etc.

Laura F. Bell
ASA(ALT) FOIA, Pubs & Records Management Officer
Acting FOIA & PCO/G4
USA ALTESS
703-604-7477
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of John Mottern
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:07 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Cost Savings on Destroyed Records?

Can the Dartnell study you refered to be downloaded off the web? Are there
any other studies available that discuss costs savings? THanks.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2