RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mohd Azman Bin Kamarolzaman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:56:47 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (103 lines)
Howabout IA roles to help end-user departments to identify records series 
that are required for audit purposes and how long they should be retained 
before they can be safely destroyed by the end-user?

Regards,

Azman Kamarolzaman
Email: [log in to unmask]



Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
06/20/2006 04:58 AM
Please respond to
[log in to unmask]


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: Reviewing & Approving Retention Schedule






I will agree with both Bruce and Peter that IA should approach records
management to inquire about how other operating units should be conducting
their business (i.e. retention schedules and procedures...) but unless 
they
have a vested interest in the retention schedule (the limit here should be
their own schedule in an overwhelming majority of cases) they should 
remain
out of the review loop.

Tod Chernikoff, CRM

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
Behalf
Of White, Bruce
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Reviewing & Approving Retention Schedule

Peter Kurilecz said:
>The key word is INDEPENDENT. That is why IA will not help in the
>development of something because they will lose their independence and
>objectivity when it comes time to test whatever is in development.

I have to agree with my friend Peter (well, I think he still is) on the 
role
of auditors in the review process.  We have a steering committee made up 
of
Legal, Finance, and other offices that have a direct interest in the
schedule; Audit is not one of the members but serves in an advisory role, 
as
needed. 

Like our records policies, we might ask their opinion on certain aspects 
of
retention but they have no say in the final schedule.  This allows them to
maintain their independence.  We create the policy (in this case the
schedule) and they audit against it. 

Bruce L. White, CRM, PMP
San Diego, CA
TEL: 619-696-4671
FAX: 619-696-2534
CELL: 619-952-7145
 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance









-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Confidentiality Notice : This e-mail  and  any attachments  are 
confidential  to  the addressee and may also be privileged.  If  you are 
not  the addressee of  this e-mail, you may not copy, forward, disclose or 
otherwise use it in any way whatsoever.  If you have received this e-mail 
by mistake,  please  e-mail  the sender by replying to this message, and 
delete the original and any print out thereof. 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2