Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:11:53 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bob:
I agree with you.
It seems that many, if not most, programs are developed this way.
On 8/17/07, bobd <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hugh .... I agree with some of what you are saying, but if I was a
> lawyer(not one)for the "records manager" I would probably counter saying
> and
> proving the whole company document management program is a sham. While
> the
> individual has the responsibilities of "Records Manager" he/she wasn't
> given
> the authority to manage the program.
>
> I think you could also convince a judge that the program was developed for
> the express purpose of building a "wall" around management. Believe there
> has been some case law that would support this.
>
> As a defense I would attempt to show that:
> . I wasn't provided the funding or support to manage the program.
> . My position was to establish and provide guidance and recommendations
> only.
>
> Besides, under Sarbane-Oxley I believe the ultimate responsibility for the
> company resides at the highest level of management.
>
> R W Dalton, CRM
> Dalton Consulting
> 1-253-229-4555
>
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|