Peter Kurilecz said "great discussion folks but how many have taken the time to go to the blog posting itself and respond there? here is an opportunity to educate someone who does not understand our
concepts"

Peter, how many people besides you (and Jesse Wilkins??) read this blog? It may sound cold-hearted, but I really don't have the time "to educate someone who does not understand our concepts" one at a time (unless, of course, he's the Mayor of New York City).

-----------------------------------
Fred Grevin
[log in to unmask]
(by BlackBerry)

----- Original Message -----
From: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thu Sep 25 16:59:27 2008
Subject: Re: [RM] E-mail, Instant & Text Message Record Destruction

great discussion folks but how many have taken the time to go to the blog
posting itself and respond there?

here is an opportunity to educate someone who does not understand our
concepts

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Graham said (in part): "I think most people have been sucked into the IT
> lie that email is complicated (kinda like the Emperor's New Clothes)."
>
> Graham, dealing with electronic records generally, and email in particular,
> is more troublesome--as well as more complicated--for several reasons I can
> think of "off the top of my head" (I'm looking forward to other postings on
> this subject by others more knowledgeable than I!).
>
> In my mind, most of the problem focusses on the costs of analysis and
> classification of the content. Here are some contributing factors:
>


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]