Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:51:36 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Patti makes a good point. In the corporate world, usually preceding
full-blown litigation there is an "issue," then a "claim," and sometimes
(particularly in the case of design & construction) an arbitration. Each
with its own file. From the standpoint of the sender of the legal hold
notices, where no litigation results, those notices could logically be
put in with the file of the last in this progression.
Point for you, Patti.
Gary Linkm, CRM
Sixburgh, PA
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Manning, Patricia L (Patti) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Legal Hold Orders
If a hold is issued, it is based on the potention of litigation, but
there will likely be a file that exists at a claim or investigation
level. Does that make sense?
Patti Manning, Records Specialist
Baker Hughes Incorporated
713-439-8667 - direct
832-866-8634 - cell
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|