Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:18:33 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Look at the purpose and introductory text, then the chart/diagram that
indicates the relationship. These are another later, designed to
explain the value and concept of RM to management, not to replace
anything... They just do a miserable job of it.
Sent from MY iPhone
On Jun 17, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have looked at the standards but am not sure how they interact
> with the other RM standards extant (15489, 26122, etc.) Anyone on
> the list who can speak more to this, specifically whether these are
> related to/supplementary to/expected to replace ISO 15489?
>
>
> Jesse Wilkins, CRM
> [log in to unmask]
> (303) 574-0749 direct
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jessewilkins
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body
> of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|