RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:39:31 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Have a look at the NSW Government guidelines:

http://services.nsw.gov.au/inside-dfs/information-communications-technology/publications/labelling-sensitive-information

In spite of the title, it's about classifying and handling as well as
labelling. The important thing is the really clear descriptions of
each level, and the fact that there are only three (of course, in an
IT system you need a fourth - "none of the other three" which I
usually call "unprotected".

And don't confuse a classification for access control and security,
with a classification (thesaurus, taxonomy, file plan) for describing
document content. They are quite different things and you will make
life difficult for yourself and your users if you try to make one tool
do both jobs. Keep it simple!

Cheers

Glenn

Glenn Sanders
Australia
0407 187 333
These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked and
they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck and Co and Glenn".
Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2