Interesting Steve:

I can see your point.  Was the change instituted?  Remind me of the recent
case in Ohio (IIRC) where court(s) ruled that a plaintiff who filed suit
regarding a FOIA request for 911 recordings (IIRC again) did not have
standing since he had no true interest in the records other than knowing
they had been destroyed too soon and wanted to collect purported damages
based on that fact alone.

Tod Chernikoff, CRM, CIP
[log in to unmask]
www.twitter.com/tchernik


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Steve Whitaker
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 12:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Should text messages by Alaska government employees be
accessible to public? | Alaska Dispatch

Depends upon definition of public.   If citizens of the State of Alaska, or
cities or counties within the state, or vendors doing business with the
State; I say yes; it is public information.      For anybody else; ...no;
not their business.

I made this argument while at the City of Reno; it was to be taken to the NV
State Legislature to introduce to modify the State's Public Records laws.
I hate paper...

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Glen Sanderson
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> If the messages are sent on state owned equipment or people are
> reimbursed for the use of their own equipment than I would say yes.
>
<snip>



--

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from
this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE
RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]