Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:47:00 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As a climate scientist formerly responsible for NOAA’s climate archive, the
most critical issue in archival of climate data is actually scientists who
are unwilling to formally archive and document their data. I spent the last
decade cajoling climate scientists to archive their data and fully document
the datasets. I established a climate data records program that was awarded
a U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2014 for visionary work in the
acquisition, production, and preservation of climate data records (CDRs),
which accurately describe the Earth’s changing environment. The most
serious example of a climate scientist not archiving or documenting a
critical climate dataset was the study of Tom Karl et al. 2015 (hereafter
referred to as the Karl study or K15), purporting to show no ‘hiatus’ in
global warming
http://bit.ly/2kljOzt
http://bit.ly/2kljOzt+
--
Peterk
Dallas, Tx
[log in to unmask]
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
“If only there were a massive entity that I were forced to fund to tell me
how I should live my life, since I’m so obviously incapable of deciding for
myself.” M. Hashimoto
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|