Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:51:47 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I used to work for the City of Irvine, here, in California. All our
documents were scanned as TIFFs but, when it came to e-mailing them we
had some minor problems. When I e-mailed them, I set it up so that they
were automatically converted to PDFs before being sent. That seemed to
fix the problem.
Steve Morgan
C.J. Segerstrom & Sons, Records Manager
(714) 438-3228 phone
(714) 546-9835 fax
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Paula Sutton
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 9:39 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Tiff vs PDF
We have been scanning documents for the past 3 years as TIFFs, but
because of an issue of OCRing a document with color and B&W pages we are
now considering scanning to PDF. What is the conventional wisdom on
TIFF vs PDFs? Is one more stable, better resolution, better at
migrating to newer releases, etc. I have heard mixed reviews with no
clear "winner" on which is the preferred format. Your advice is most
appreciated! Thanks to all of you who responded to "how far is far
enough" too!
Paula Sutton
Records and Scanning Specialist/Archivist
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
220 Water Avenue
Berthoud, CO 80513
(970) 622-2289
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|