RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:29:01 -0800
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
On 11/2/06, Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> "According to the proposed privacy regulation, documents relating to
> uses and disclosures, authorization forms, business partner contracts,
> notices of your information practice, responses to a patient who wants
> to amend or correct their information, the patient's statement of
> disagreement, and a complaint record must be maintained for 6 years.
> (See 64 Fed. Reg. 59994)."

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/retrieve.html

the above quote is not quite accurate. the proposed rule states;

"unless otherwise addressed in this proposal covered entities would be
required to retain these documents for 6 years, which is the statute
of limitation period for the civil penalties."

Why inaccurate? because just above that statement the propose rule
says that some items will be maintained as long as the PHI is
maintained.

pak

-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2