On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
> My questions:
> 1. Did I describe the QC process and the intent of the QC Log correctly?
> 2. Am I correct in thinking that scanned records really need to have a
> documented QC process? If so, what can I use to convince them?
>
check out this link
Electronic imaging—Information stored electronically—Recommendations for
trustworthiness and reliability
http://shrinkster.com/11hb
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]