Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:39:34 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi all,
I am putting together an internal marketing piece on our document management
system to encourage its use by a larger segment of our employees. One of
the target audiences is our membership - the shareholders - who are often
most encouraged when a propsal will have a positive effect on the
profitability of our firm.
That being the case, I'm hoping to get some anectodal - or factual -
feedback from this esteemed group on what you have experienced with regard
to the effect an EDMS (or other similar system - EDRMS, etc.) has had on the
volume of paper being purchased and/or being maintained by your
organizations. If you would, I'd be grateful if you'd answer the following
questions for me:
1. Has the implementation of an EDMS reduced the amount of paper your
organization buys and/or stores? If so, by what percentage have your paper
costs reduced?
2. How long did it take, after implementation of your EDMS, for a reduction
in paper costs to be realized?
3. When purchasing your EDMS, what were the ROI factors that most
contributed to the "buy" decision: hard cost savings (reduced paper
purchasing and storage costs, etc.) or soft cost savings (employee
efficiency, improved info re-use, etc.).
4. Have any of you seen it more as a cost shift from paper costs to cost of
scanning activities, resulting in a flat ROI?
Thanks in advance for your time and advice!
Julie
Julie J. Colgan
[log in to unmask]
http://twitter.com/juliecolgan
http://www.linkedin.com/in/juliejcolgan
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|