RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jim Mullen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:14:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Good Morning All,

Question for the masses along with my 2nd cup o'joe.

In a long-term electronic records storage environment where retentions can be 50 years or more for large portions of the data and where said records have been moved from the "production environment" to an "archive" server, is there a documented standard, best practice, or recommendation from a recognized authority on how often those records should be reviewed for integrity and any other management purposes?

Our "production" repository repository for said data is approach 20 terrabytes and as I'm writing the instructions on how to use the chosen tool to archive to a near-line repository, the above question bubbled to the surface.

Thanks in advance.

Jim Mullen
Wichita, KS

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2