key quote from the story
" "This is a hacking statute, the kind of statute they use if you try to
break into a government system or private business for some nefarious
purpose. It's to protect against identity fraud, to keep somebody from
taking somebody's intellectual property or trade secrets."
"I have to ask: Don't the prosecutors have more important things to do with
their time?""
just heard a discussion on FNC about this story. sounds like a case of using
a sledge hammer on a tack
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:13 AM, sasha babin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> What comes next???
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/27/us-man-hacking-wifes-emails
>
>
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbytehttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]