Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:07:43 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Adam:
We consolidated based on record function i.e. if it functioned as a voucher (regardless of what it was called) it was scheduled as a "voucher" with all "vouchers" having one retention period.
Ginny Jones
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI)
Records Manager
Information Technology Division
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adam Herbst
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 2:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] Consolidating Records Series - Records Retention Schedules
All:
I am involved in a project to consolidate many (many) retention schedules.
As part of that project, similar records series are being consolidated, as
well. I'm interested in hearing from folks who have done something similar
and specifically, if when consolidating records series, you consolidated
based on similar *subject matter* or similar *retention periods* (e.g., all
IP records series with the same retention period get one records series
after consolidation).
Thank you.
Adam Herbst
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|