RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:33:06 +0000
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
In-Reply-To:
<01ec01ccbe5f$72a4b830$57ee2890$@com>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From:
"Scott, Paul (ITC)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Jesse asks a very provocative question:  "I wonder how much value CA is to most records managers?"



And, to be honest, this is a question many archivists (mostly uncertified archivists) also ask.



Succinctly, my contention is that the designation is valuable because most records managers, whether they acknowledge it or not, are de facto archivists as we are responsible for identifying, preserving, and making records of permanent value accessible to those who need them.



Being designated as a Certified Archivist is evidence that the holder thinks about the future as well as the present and the past as we realize that some records have continuing value even after serving the purpose for which they were created.  If an organization is concerned about its future, it should be concerned about its archives.



Paul R. Scott, CA, CRM
Records Management Officer
Harris County, TX
713 368-0039

Under the Texas Public Information Act most written communications to or from public employees are considered to be public records and will be made available to the public and the media upon request.  This e-mail and any direct reply may be subject to public disclosure.




ATOM RSS1 RSS2