Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:53:11 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"- it is still a record which is out of compliance with your record retention schedule"
Is it not out of compliance only if your standard practice, policy, procedures and guidelines call for destruction at end of life?
For example, a good number of University Records at end of life are "disposed" to the archive rather than the trash. These are essentially re-classified as historical artifacts. They are no longer business records which is why the Archivists have such freedom to grant such access . . .
I don't know about the reclassification as non-record, but I can see a case for a reclass into some form of reference material. That is what the review for historical value at the end of life is for.
I too am wearing a flame suit . . .
Rikki Chesley, CRM
University Records Manager
Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library
Emory University
Robert W. Woodruff Library
540 Asbury Circle
Atlanta, Georgia 30322
404-727-8816
[log in to unmask]
________________________________
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|