Why should anybody else have rights to others' records?   It is not their
state; it is not their city; they are not a citizen or a resident; they pay
no taxes there; and they do not do business there.  They have no rights to
those entitities' public records; which should be restricted to only those
above.

I have property in Missouri and I also have a residence in Ohio.  I would
not expect to have any rights to receive public records from any other
state or commonwealth; or city or county in any other states.

I agree with federal FOIA rights as I am a citizen.  I agree with states
and commonwealths having state public records laws; open records laws; or a
state version of a FOIA.   However, they should not apply to anyone who
does not meet the critera I have defined in this thread.


I hate paper ...


Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:59 PM, David T. Macknet <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>  Steve,
>
>  Why must they have rights within the political entity?  Why privilege
> those who live there?  If the records pertain to someone outside the
> political entity, or are of interest to that person, it would seem that
> they should be available.  By restricting them to people who have "rights"
> to them, they're essentially restricted.
>
>  -D
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



--

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]