And I disagree with that.
I hate paper ...
Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> Under Federal FOIA laws, you don't even have to be a citizen to file a
> FOIA request.
>
>
> Judy K. Tyler, CRM
> Records Management/FOIA/PA/Forms Management Officer
> Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center
> Fort Hood, TX 76544
> DSN 738-8009
> Commercial 254-288-8009
> Fax 254-286-7755
>
> Serving to heal...honored to Serve
>
> "Compassionate, World-Class Healthcare - One Patient at a Time"
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Steve Whitaker
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 1:36 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Should text messages by Alaska government employees be
> accessible to public? | Alaska Dispatch
>
> Why should anybody else have rights to others' records? It is not their
> state; it is not their city; they are not a citizen or a resident; they
> pay no taxes there; and they do not do business there. They have no rights
> to those entitities' public records; which should be restricted to only
> those above.
>
> I have property in Missouri and I also have a residence in Ohio. I would
> not expect to have any rights to receive public records from any other
> state or commonwealth; or city or county in any other states.
>
> I agree with federal FOIA rights as I am a citizen. I agree with states
> and commonwealths having state public records laws; open records laws; or a
> state version of a FOIA. However, they should not apply to anyone who
> does not meet the critera I have defined in this thread.
>
>
> I hate paper ...
>
>
> Best regards, Steve
> Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:59 PM, David T. Macknet <[log in to unmask]
> >wrote:
>
> > Steve,
> >
> > Why must they have rights within the political entity? Why privilege
> > those who live there? If the records pertain to someone outside the
> > political entity, or are of interest to that person, it would seem
> > that they should be available. By restricting them to people who have
> "rights"
> > to them, they're essentially restricted.
> >
> > -D
> >
> >
> > List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> > Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe
> > from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place
> > UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> > mailto:[log in to unmask]
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards, Steve
> Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe
> from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place
> UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
--
Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
