RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:21:57 -0500
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Is better information governance always better?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
From:
Gordy Hoke <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
I, too, enjoyed Cordwainer Smith.

The current issue about communication in information governance is 
this:  The lack of consensus amongst IG stakeholders limits 
communication and, therefore, the gains IG can achieve.  IG lacks a 
generally accepted definition and vocabulary, and this makes 
communication difficult.

As for transparency:  The Principles (nee GARP) apply to IG as well as 
RIM.  Clearly (pun intended), transparency is a goal deserving ongoing 
effort.

Gordy
Gordon E.J. Hoke, IGP, CRM
NE Illinois, USA
[log in to unmask]

On 6/25/2014 10:05 AM, David Gaynon wrote:
> Here is the quote
>
> "Poor communications deter theft;
> good communications promote theft;
> perfect communications stop theft.
> —Van Braam "
>


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2