Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:27:37 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Gary Link asked for feedback on views of a RRS from various levels. My
suggestions are shown below:
>At Ground Level:
>
>· Tells staff how long to retain their records. (Yes, I agree.)
>
>
>At 10,000 feet:
>
>· Demonstrates that the organization is aware of the regulatory and
>operational requirements to retain information.
>
>When a RIM program is implemented, it includes applying RRS to an
>organizationıs records. This leads to the following benefits:
>
>· Reduces cost.
>· Reduces risk.
>· Helps protect your assets and reputation.
>
>(The RRS only specifies how long the organization should retain records,
>it doesnıt enact anything. To put the RRS into action, an organization
>needs a program with policies and procedures, including those programmed
>into computing applications.)
As always, this is one womanıs opinion.
Pilar C. McAdam, CRM, ERMm
[log in to unmask]
Los Angeles, CA
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|