Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:57:33 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Organization: |
Fares Family |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was, just today, told by a young, runny-nosed lawyer who shall remain nameless, that a records and information management professional does not have the "credentials" to legally define the difference between what is considered a "record" and what is "information" or, by his understanding (limited though it may be by his intellect), a "non-record" by definition.
I am calling upon "The Horde" to build a case to refute this argument at our next meeting. What do you consider the best definition of a "record" vs. "information" and what is your argument?
My apologies if I am pre-empting "Friday Ponderings" (which I enjoy), but this is a IGP/CRM smack down!
Warmest regards,
Angela Fares
[log in to unmask] (if you want to go rogue)
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|