looking the first Sedona document provide below I couldn't find anything
addressing "instantaneous"

Part Two Implementing the Legal Hold states;
"Once the duty to preserve information arises, an organization must decide
what to preserve and how to accomplish that
preservation. In some circumstances, the duty to preserve requires only
that a limited number of known historical
documents be located and preserved. In other circumstances, the scope of
the information is larger and the sources of the
information may not be known to counsel."

if certain types of information can be placed on hold almost instanteously
that has to be taken into consideration, but I think the key from the court
standpoint would be - what is the organization's legal hold process and is
it being followed in a consistent manner.

also in the document it states "Although a notice is likely to be necessary
in many, if not most, instances, there are
circumstances where a notice may not be necessary and, in fact, may be an
encumbrance or source of confusion.
Examples include situations in which all sources of likely relevant
information are subject to permanent retention
pursuant to the organization’s record retention policy; and situations in
which all sources of the information can be
*immediately secured* without requiring preservation actions by employees."

many IT departments can immediately secure information without the
knowledge or actions of the employees subject to the hold. but
instantaneously? semantics

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>
> https://thesedonaconference.org/system/files/.../sedona.../Legal_holds.pdf
>
>
> http://www.thefederation.org/documents/4.%20Effective%20Preservation%20of%20Electronic%20Info.pdf
>
> I
>


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP
[log in to unmask]
Dallas, Texas
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archives-in-the-news
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
#*CantbeworsethanPeterk*
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/CantbeworsethanPeterk?src=hash>
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]