not really the RM committee is concerned with tactical decisions about records management, the IG committee is more strategic in nature with that in mind my ideal IG committee would consist of the following Legal RM IT Security Privacy Compliance (if such a group exists within the organization) all other groups such as Finance, Tax, Audit, HR, Operational groups would be brought on temporarily when their expertise is needed. If a group is too large it becomes lethargic and not nimble. The groups I named looked at information in an organization in a holistically. this opinion and $3.75 might get you something at $tarbucks On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Think back to the people that are put together to draft and issue a > retention schedule and develop a Records Management policy... Funny, but > it's not any different. Which is why I keep saying, it's the SAME THING, > only different. > > -- Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP [log in to unmask] Dallas, Texas Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org http://twitter.com/RAINbyte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/ http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archives-in-the-news http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/ http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz #*CantbeworsethanPeterk* <https://twitter.com/hashtag/CantbeworsethanPeterk?src=hash> Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message. mailto:[log in to unmask]
