On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
well my humble apologies then, but do tell how one keeps the  politics out
of a story like this one?

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dennis Tallerico <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> WOW - about as  un-professional as it gets.
>
> Suggestion - just drop the politics.
>
> Dennis Tallerico

The admonition given to the group THEN was:

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:    Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:47:30 -0400

I agree with what John has written below. The list needs to focus upon the
facts and discuss the issue in a professional manner. We need to leave the
political partisanship at the door and discuss this as if we were facing the
same problem within our organizations. Strip away the names and the
political identity and think of this as if it was a ICRM Part VI case study.
for example
"Governor Jones has two personal internet email accounts that are
occasionally used for government business. The state does not have a clear
cut policy concerning such use nor a technical method for capturing the
emails.  you as the state records manager must as part of your duties draft
a new policy statement that takes into account future communication
technology as well as identifying tools or methods that can be used to
capture these type of emails.""

now have at it.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]