Mime-Version: |
1.0 (1.0) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2015 09:32:44 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Agree 100% with these comments- irrespective of media, form, or format, you must apply consistent practices to the deletion/destruction/preservation of records.
Larry
[log in to unmask]
Sent from MY iPhoneSeĆs
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 9:13 AM, NKhramtsovsky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Stephen asked "... what level of detail is recommended as proof of
> destruction at the document level? What pieces of metadata should be
> retained, if any, for auditing/reporting purposes?"
>
> In my opinion, you should ask yourself: which metadata remain for the paper
> records of the same kind? Do you really need more? Metadata are
> discoverable, and too much metadata may disclose sensitive or confidential
> information.
>
> Mary Binkholder asked ". How do you "destroy" electronic records?"
>
> IMHO You should really destroy the data (preferably according to NIST
> recommendations,
> http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-88r1.pdf )
> at least by re-writing them AND destroy/rewrite all the corresponding
> back-ups AND do you best to destroy all the uncontrolled copies :)
>
> With my best regards,
> Natasha Khramtsovsky
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|