Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:14:12 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
<< The only reason I can think of for categorizing retention period laws into made-up categories of laws like 'IP laws' etc. is to enable efficient routing of legal questions to appropriate specialist attorneys.>>
If I understand you correctly, I disagree. Grouping legal citations into categories is the only way I know of to logically associate dozens or hundreds of individual citations to a single record series.
<<. If it is a retention period bucket then grouping all potentially applicable (or potentially applicable) laws into categories by retention period/length of time doesn't accomplish anything. For example, it doesn't matter that a labor law, that applies to certain HR records at your company, coincidentally has the same retention period as a customer notice letter you also create at your company.>>
The same is true here, we have several Operations related legal groups that consist of nothing more than a collection of requirements with a common retention requirement/consideration. Creating individual legal groups for hundreds of individual requirements would significantly increase the complexity of the schedule.
Bill Roach, CRM
Opinions are my own and not those of my employer or any other individual or entity.
This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|