Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2018 16:51:57 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Rob,
My opinion (and only mine): Storage vendors already own the shrink-wrapping equipment (for stabilizing stacks of boxes on pallets for shipment, which is a good thing), and their marketing teams have come up with another way to use what they already own to create a new income stream: "Let's tell customers that their boxes will be safer in case a sprinkler goes off, and we can charge them an extra fee!" If you subsequently want the vendor to retrieve a file from inside a shrink-wrapped box, I wouldn't be surprised to discover that there is an additional fee to remove the shrink-wrapping.
I agree with you that good air circulation is important to the long-term safety of paper records - wrapping them in plastic could promote mold growth.
I wish I wasn't so cynical about the motives of storage companies. I didn't start out that way but have had to develop a suspicious mind to protect against their ever-expanding strategies to increase their income at the expense of good customer service.
Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
[log in to unmask]
Los Angeles, CA
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|