RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:59:28 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I was reading the paper (yes Bill, I know how to read) and the article was
addressing the new banking regs. The new regs allow 24 hour turnaround. They
do this by imaging the check and disposing of the original (cool so far).
However, the regs (according to the article), stipulate that the digital
image is not a record. To get a record, carrying the same force of law as
the original, a hard copy must be generated. Even Bill Roach in the dead of
winter would not come up with a more backward way of addressing this issue.

Tell me it ain't so.

Chris Flynn

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2