RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Electronic filing
From:
JESSE WILKINS <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:05:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines) 
IANARM (i am not a records manager), but I would think they would - perhaps
with the added note to address migration for electronic records with longer
retention periods. It's all about the content, after all, regardless of
whether the particular record is paper, or microfilm, or Microsoft Word 2003
document on a network drive.

Cheers,

Jesse Wilkins
IMERGE Consulting
[log in to unmask]

>From: Gerry Clifford <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Electronic filing
>Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:35:48 EDT
>
>Morning all,
>
>I guess this should be for our government type folks on the list.  This has
>to do with electronic filing retention schedules.
>
>My question is wouldn't they (schedules) follow the same path as a
>hardcopy?
>Any clarifications would be appreciated.
>
>Regards,
>Gerry
>
>List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2