RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Electronic filing
From:
Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:55:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines) 
Gerry,

The record copy in hardcopy, is the original record. The record copy, in
electronic records, is the most current version.

Chris Flynn

P.S. someone go wake Larry up



I've stopped 22,970 spam messages. You can too!
One month FREE spam protection at
http://www.cloudmark.com/spamnetsig/?rc=7hjtaa


-----Original Message-----
From: Gerry Clifford [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Electronic filing

Morning all,

I guess this should be for our government type folks on the list.  This has
to do with electronic filing retention schedules.

My question is wouldn't they (schedules) follow the same path as a hardcopy?
Any clarifications would be appreciated.

Regards,
Gerry

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2