LISTSERV - RECMGMT-L Archives - LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	RECMGMT-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-Transfer-Encoding:	8bit
Sender:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Time to Mange Paper - Follow-up
From:	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:07:49 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (19 lines)

In a message dated 11/2/2004 12:42:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Barry Malone" <[log in to unmask]> writes:

>Point taken, BUT if this is the only data available is it better than
>nothing?  Is there no one out there that has thought enough of this
>subject to conduct a validated survey?

well there are some statistical studies that can be considered valid in the book "The myth of the paperless office" by Sellen and Harper there are some graphs from the Paper Federation of Great Britain that show paper consumption
http://www.paper.org.uk/info/statistics/consumption.htm

if you haven't read this book you should

--
Peter A. Kurilecz CRM, CA
Richmond, Va
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IGGURU.US