RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"A.Khramtsovsky" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:01:03 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Dear colleagues,

Can someone explain to me the logic behind some main conclusions of the
Forrester survey, namely:

 -  "RIM professionals have an exaggerated sense of their final
responsibility for ERM policies and user requirements",
-  "Rim professionals may not be fully aware of all ERM activity within the
enterprise".

I don't see how survey data support these conclusions. IMHO if RIM data were
gathered among ARMA members i.e. the cream of the profession, it's quite
natural to see higher role for RIM in their responses!

Regards,

Natasha Khramtsovsky
Records Manager,
APR-Bank,
Goncharnaya ul. 15, stroenie 2,
Moscow, 119240, Russia
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2