RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date:
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:50:55 -0500
Reply-To:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: 1970's "Michigan Study" on Cost of Misfiles
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<0DF98983FFC5D5119B7B0002A574CC3B03C961AA@SPARMAIL4>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:11:26 +1000, John Lovejoy
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The general consensus is that such a study did not take place, and that the
> figures oft quoted do not have any basis in fact.

The general consensus is that Coopers & Lybrand did a study of
misfiles, BUT no one on this list has ever seen the study that is so
oft-quoted by vendors and practictioners alike.

Donna's posting is the first mention of a "Michigan study" that I'm aware of.

--
Peter Kurilecz
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2